7th CPC Notional pay and Pension Ready Reckoner for pre 2016 Pensioners

6 thoughts on “7th CPC Notional pay and Pension Ready Reckoner for pre 2016 Pensioners”

1. Ghulam Hasan Ghamgeen

   June 20, 2017 at 22:29

   Pensioner union should file a case against the govt.lmmediately for higher pension.I think that the govt. should give a part of allowances to the pensioners also on priority basis.The pensioners who are living in rented houses they should also get rent allowance if not more atleast 50%.lsn’t it true and just.
2. RBKV Ramanan, Advocate

   June 16, 2017 at 12:02

   Both Mr Vaidyanathan and Mr S g p are correct in their views. Let me add something to buttress the case of pensioners.

   Pensioners Association should consider filing case before the CAT Principal Bench, eventually the Govt may see reasons for rejection of First Option is too hollow. What about pensioners having records of their service details? Lack of feasibility of records in their cases would be too juvenile. Employees who did not get ACP & MACP benefits were the worst hit.

   The fact of the matter is that all pensioners are in possession of Pension Payment Order (PPO) issued to every pensioner. The decision on the modified formulation may not be all that attractive as claimed to be. However, if it is considered ‘more beneficial’ to more pensioners than the first option recommended by the 7th CPC, let it be an additional option known as modified option. First option recommended by the 7th CPC should not be scarified at the behest of the modified option to leave the pensioners in lurch who possess relevant records, information etc., which is the most advantageous in their cases if they give option under first option. Therefore the claim that the first option was not found to be feasible to implement it on account of non-availability of records would pale into insignificance. Where in some cases, the First Option, if implemented would lead to anomalies, way out could be worked out to redress the grievance. Which GoI order concerning with monetary benefits is not prone to anomaly? Let there be three options viz., First Option, Second Option and Modified Option, let the pensioners wisdom prevail to choose which would be more advantageous to them. It is not good to belittle the First Option to nullity, after all the Govt. earlier has decided to accept it in principle. The pensioners who stand to benefit by First Option should not be deprived of their benefits due to modified formula of the Govt. which requires reconsideration. All Associations and Federations should take note of this.
3. P.N.Vaidyanathan

   June 12, 2017 at 17:55

   Mr.SGP is correct. government has cheated the pensioners by failing
   to implement the option1 (old) citing feasibility–beaurocrats were jealous of
   implementing this as they were too lazy to collect the details–all available with
   the banks or treasuries with the relevant PPO numbers
   Our serving brothers should rally behind us in this regaard
4. Devendra Nath Bhattacharya

   June 3, 2017 at 22:11

   Pensioner submit the application or pop sent by the cda pension allabhad
5. s g p

   May 27, 2017 at 15:52

   unions should file a case in principle bench of cat regarding option 1 pension revision without any delay as union could not get macp benefits to cg employees retired between1-1-2006 to 30-08-2008 even though they they raised this benefit but kept quiet after the committee brought that out if the same is that is notional fixation then many serving employees will loose benefit. Therefore now in this case also i feel they will clarify they made great efforts for retired staff but they will say one common word SORRY and chapter closed .Time has come for pensioners Association to think the way we have to move in this regard.
6. Gopal palande

   May 26, 2017 at 18:14

   Very good, and imp.information i am getting regularly . Many thanks .